type_wild: (So what - Waya)
The reason I hate vegans is that I have no problems consuming egg and dairy yet googling for vegetarian versions of various dishes requires me to specificy "-vegan" because if not the first ten hits are without fail ones that on principle exclude cheese and yoghurt.

Also, fungi are fundamentally disturbing organisms and I am genetically programmed since generations beyond written history to find it revolting to consume things that exist solely to decompose organic material.







*I don't actually hate vegans
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)
Me being who I am, it's interesting that the only version of Mary Poppins with which I'm completely familiar is the first novel. I never saw the film until I caught the last half of it on the TV a year ago, and I've seen the beginning of the stage musical (thank you youtube) and listened to the soundtrack.

Going into Mary Poppins Returns thus means I'm going back to a story that has neither particular nostalgia value nor a whole lot of thematic ressonance for me, because I know it as fragments, mainly musical, and not really as a complete story.

Said story is pretty much a remix of the last one. The Banks Family is mildly dysfunctional, The Bank Is Being Mean, Mary Poppins teaches them to fix things by bringing a healthy dose of insanity into their lives. The music is also pretty much a remix of the last one. There's a new "Jolly Holiday" sequence, a new "Step In Time", a new "Let's Go Fly A Kite". There are, of course, numerous smaller callbacks to the first film. Interestingly, Mary Poppins II also borrows from the stage musical: "Cheery Tree Lane" is a musical motif that pops up a couple of times, and Step In Time 2018 also seems to draw more from the stage version than the sixties film. We can debate the merits of trying to be a new Mary Poppins to the extreme where you're just painting a new layer of varnish over the old story. Somehow, the stage adaptation of the story is far more transformative than the sequel is, and I don't think this is doing the sequel any favours. When it recreates the original piece by piece, it lays itself open to the inevitable comparisons - and it doesn't come out on top.

It's a fun spectacle, but suffering a light case of the La La Land syndrome: A flashy display that is too sleek, too polished, and so becomes forgettable afterwards. La La Land was much worse in this regard, mind, and this film is absolutely fun and charming and more memorable. But where the sixties film (or I mean, at least the half of it that counts) is a masterpiece, this one is merely good enough. Being not-as-good as a masterpiece obviously doesn't mean it's bad. I had fun! Unlike La La Land, I wasn't regretting the money I spent on the ticket and the time I spent on watching it. I'll probably get the two-in-one BD that is sure to be released come autumn, so that I can finally see all of the first film too.

Minor hicups:
- Odd casting choice in the dub (if they're going to use period-accurate forms of polite address that the target audience are fourty years too young to remember in use, they could've used the period-accurate sociolectal differences rather than having Jack speak the only dialect considered so embarassing that people stop speaking it when they move away)

- Super awkward attempt at unncessary romantic subplot. It would've just been annoying if they hadn't made him make Those Eyes at both Mary and Topsy and not, I noted, the woman he holds hands with in the final number. Come on, he obviously likes them at least thirty years older.

- The emotional turning point of the film does not come across as believable. Particularly given the fact that children ARE liars and the world would've been a better place if more parents would acknowledge it. Of course, the fool is me hoping for Disney to acknowledge that the nuclear family isn't by essence a beacon of truth and goodness

- is nineteen thirties London really the right place to belt out an ending moral about how the only way things can go from here on is upwards?
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)

(partially reworked from tumblr)

I paid too little attention to the second half of Banana Fish to write a useful review of it. I was supposed to re-watch it over Christmas with my sister, who hadn't kept up, but then it turned out that she'd caught up anyway. So here's your quality gauge: I won't be watching this anime again unless someone pays me for it.  

The thing is, had Banana Fish not been what it is, I’d have dropped it five episodes in. But Banana Fish is noteworthy just for being what it is: namely an adaptation of a shoujo classic that’s usually sorted into the BL fold somehow, following shortly after a previous anime by the same studio that was also about a pair of dudes who had the kind of relationship the female audience eats up and regurgitates on pixiv.

In short: It's a mediocre action-drama gangster anime which is mainly interesting becaues a lot of people are swearing up and down that the main guys are a couple, even if it never happens on screen. It's not awful. It's not great. My enjoyment ended pretty quickly after my favourite character was killed, and that, I think, says everything that needs to be saying about the writing of both characters and plot. 

Well, that and the fact that I was watching Sailor Moon on my work commute over the same time period as I finally made the effort of catching up with the last three months of Banana Fish. And Sailor Moon was three times more fun.

Spoilers below.

On where things went wrong, and the unfortunate implications in the depiction of queer men )
type_wild: (lol @ this - Riza and Otani)
I always though Sacred Stones was the redheaded stepchild of the FE family, but the number of Ephraim and Eirika alts alts in Heroes suggests otherwise. With some with fiftysomething orbs, I got Christmas Ephraim, Christmas Lissa, and (5*) Lute, whoo. I can't decide whether I'm satisfied that my Ephraim collection is still complete, or be kind of disappointed that I still only have one Eirika.
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)
Discussion on the nonexistent AO3 app, and specifically on the potent question that why the sodding hell do you want an app when there is a fully functional mobile website
type_wild: (Stare - Subaru and Hokuto)
Of all things to follow on social media, I'm following this tumblr liveblog of some guy reading Tsubasa Chronicles and he's on Asian Pacific time and he's just reacehd that chapter* and I can't decide if this is the worst or the best reason for not going to bed at a reasonable time.







*the one with Chi and the stabbity-stabby
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)
As the current stories go, although official word of course does not confirm it:

Tumblr is only the disc one villain in this story. The final boss is the ghost of Steve Jobs

The one thing I oddly have yet to mention in either of my lengthy missives about my ill-fated love of the Windows Phone OS, was the fact that like half the reason I'm here in the first place is becaues I'll be dead before I'll own a bloody Iphone. It's a long and very petty story, but suffice it to say that my bitter annoyance with Apple naturally grew into a keen interest in criticism of Apple. The criticism of Apple that existed a decade ago was mainly concerned with its Walled Garden politics.

Quickly summarised: A walled garden is platform where the content available is curated by the people running it - in the specific case of the Iphone, the fact that the only software you're allowed to install on your device is software that follows the guidelines of the IOS app store.

With the way the internet and the usage of computers has evolved the last decade and half, it's hardly surprising that walled gardens are par for the course of the everyman. Most people I know use the internet mainly for social media and media consumption, all of which happen either on apps or on proprietary websites. The generation before me learned to use computers in order to use spreadsheets and text editing at work; the generation after are the digital natives who cannot imagine a world without youtube. But nineties kids were young when the internet was young.

I entered fandom when the web was still the open sea that required some fundamental tech knowledge to be navigated, but which was gloriously anarchic and gloriously equal when you learned how to make and share your websites. Even the fandom hubs were non-profit and run by amateurs. My computer was a tool, and the idea that the people manufacturing the tool was going to tell me what I was allowed to use it for was ridiculous. Even if my childish boicott of Iproducts wasn't a thing, I'd still be uncomfortable, to say the least, about using a platform that effectively wanted to dictate how I was using it. (ironically, the Windows store too is a Walled Garden. Let's talk about my hypocricy later)

But fandom, for all that it was full of early adopters in 2001, found its home in the proto-social media on LJ, and when it migrated from LJ, it didn't go to the known fandom-friendly LJ clones, but to modern social media. Finding out why people went to tumblr instead of dreamdwidth is nigh impossible at this point; whichever came first, fact is that the migration from LJ coincided with the smartphones taking over the mobile market. The result: A considerable amount of fandom is happening on phones, not computers. Phones use apps, and the stats say that about half of those apps will be curated by the IOS app store.

And the Apple business model is to be accessible to all users, and to be accessible to all users there needs to be handholding and protecting of the children, so ix-nay on the porn.

There is a debate going on about the World Wide Web vs. the app-based internet usage that I sadly have not followed nearly close enough to say something insightful about, but the tumblr strikethrough is the point where it hits fandom. Because if tumblr is purging the smut becaues it lost half its mobile users, then there is a lot to be said about how Apple's policy makers are effectively no-platforming creators on third-party software, and policing the content consumption of their own customers. Ideally, you could say that this is of course the choice the IOS users make when they buy an Idevice, but if Apple is using their size to dictate the content on a third-party platform, then the internet just got a great bit worse than I used to think that it was.

I might never have been a particularly avid fan of tumblr, but dear god, if there ever was a reason for arguing that the move from the web to app-based internet was Bad News, it is if the policymakers of some multinational company is going to decide what kind of pictures I get to look at on a website which they do not even own.

ETA 15/12: The latest story going around is that tumblr was planning the porn bann already in August or September, though I can't find this confirmed anywhere. If it's true, it disproves the causality I speculate about here. Though not, I'm afraid, the theory behind it.
type_wild: (Default)
This was originally a post about the depiction of race in human!AU Zootropolis fanart (yes Nick is a victim of racism but drawing him as a white man only becomes racist-per-definition if you insist on reading the film as an allegory strictly of the contemporary US, and there are numerous indications that he is in fact meant to be read as white, now go wank about how it's racist to depict a white person as a victim of racism and stay clueless about how ethnic discrimination works in all other parts of the world)

Outside of discovering my new favourite 3D animated film, I've been following and slowly growing disillutioned with Banana Fish, because I've also been watching Sailor Moon on my work commute and it's just so much more fun. And, yanno, it can frankly state that people are gay without also having to make a point out of how they're rapists and-slash-or pedophiles.

I've been reading stuff in no language relevant to the internet, except I've recently been reading Emilia Galotti and I expected something poetic and parodically sentimental, but good god it is genuinely funny (I mean, for being a story ending with an honor killing). I'm finding that I enjoy reading drama a lot more than I thought I could, and that has set me wondering about the dialogue-fic you'd once upon a time find on FFN. I never understood why people would write dialogue-only fic, but if my stint of reading drama has proven anything, it is that I can certainly see why people might enjoy reading it.
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)
Oh you know you've reached some level of extraordinary nerdery when you google karlsruhe katholisch oder evangelisch even though FFS, what are the chances of some seventies shoujo artist knowing the goddamn difference and the implications of the ending are pretty goddamn clear. I mean. The genre draws back to a (widely assumed autobiographical) novel set in a French boarding school and we all know which version of Christianity belongs there.

The break with traditional western Christian narrative has left me confused )

If you're actually curious: Contemporary statistics say there are about equal numbers of Protestants and Catholics in Karlsruhe. Although Baden in the nineteenth century saw Catholics outweighting Protestants two to one, Karlsruhe was one of the few districts with a Protestant majority. But of course, Schlotterbach isn't actually in Karlsruhe but somewhere unspecified north of it, so who the hell even knows what things would be like a hundred and thirty years later. 2017 stats say Baden-Württemberg has 30% Protestants, 33% Catholics.

I also spent some quality wiki time trying to figure out if their giving their location as "Baden" rather than Baden-Württemberg could somehow be an indication of period, but the only post-WWII entity known as Baden only was further south (and ceased to exist when BaWü was founded in 1952, anyway). So the best indication of "when is this even happening" seems to be Siegfried's groovy sunglasses and flower power hair, unless someone can actually get something useful out of Julius' friend's car.

2020 ETA: According to our lord and saviors Google and Wikipedia, the only thing named "Schlotterbach" in Germany is a tributary to the the tributary to the tributary to some river in the district of Ravensburg, which is in fact in BaWü. On the opposite end of Bawû from Karlsruhe, though, so the real question remains how Hagio even found the name in the first place.
type_wild: (Default)
Little over halfway through Moana and there is so, so, so much to love about this story BUT

the musical numbers are utterly meh, and the directing of them is so painfully tonally wrong, and why would you be getting into someone's sad backstory in some shoddy attempt at the villain version of "Under The Sea", who thought that this was a good idea

Moana

Sep. 1st, 2018 01:13 am
type_wild: (Default)
Or 'Vaiana' as it's named around here, thanks to a copyrighted porn star name )

It might in part be the fact that Wind Waker and Spirit Tracks were the only Zelda games that engaged me enought to spend hours on them, but this is a genuinely good film and it's a goddamn pity that the songs are so meh.

Like, even the fucking Phil Collins numbers from the millenial era worked better than the songs in this one.

But except from that it's really great, and certainly far above the medicricy of Frozen.
type_wild: (Default)
So I'm doing Project 333, apparently.

It's about limiting your wardrobe to 33 items for 3 months, so here's me taking the plunge to see if I can pull of the shirt/tie/waistcoat combo as well as all the stylish girls on pinterest.

This because I finally caved and made a reddit account singlehandedly to moan about all the books I don't want to throw away but god there are so many of them.
type_wild: (Default)
My mother once told me that she never felt like an adult until she became a mother, and I can see that. Socialising a little barbarian into a functional member of society leaves little room for joking around, so of course adults are boring and mean.

And I have, indubitably, reached that age myself because I went into a store to look for a foodskin today, and when I asked if they had more lunchboxes than the ones up front, was promptly pointed towards "the Disney ones and the ones with [some brand with bears that people with small children are clearly expected to be familiar with]", because of course women in their thirties don't buy luncboxes for themselves.

In the supermarket, I got myself my very first Marvel merch, which was also my very first lego that I've bought with my own cash (Thor and Loki, if you're curious). And then I was carded at the self-check-out for something from ages six and up, which I guess was either Moana or Zootropolis.

I'm pretty sure I have to surrender all claims at parenthood anyway by finding this funny.

type_wild: (Tea - Masako)


Four or five years ago, I did a Mari Kondo on my habitat, and got rid of 50-ish DVDs, a good number of CDs, twelve shopping bags worth of clothing, two boxes of kitchen stuff, and a number of books I've since forgotten. I think it was more than a hundred. My home did not feel emptier for it, only tidier, and the only thing I regretted handing off was a Desigual sweater that had been hideously expensive and worn maybe twice in the year since I bought it. I never missed a single thing I carried out; even the sweater was more a matter of being sad about the wasted money and how it was beautiful but it wasn't me.

I don't know what I did wrong to get there, but the last couple of weeks has seen youtube replace my normal dish of musicals, political satire and cooking with bullet journaling which turned into weird lifestyle vids which turned into meal prepping and minimalism. All of which is met with I'm not some coconut oil lovin' youtube housewife, I'm not one of those people while obsessive watching their vids for tips anyway.

And the core tenet of minimalism, the entire "useless physical objects demand your attention and divert your focus from life", is one that is undeniably tempting.

The problem, which I'm sure is in fact what minimalism is philosophically out to solve, is that what is left of my clutter (minimalist lingo for useless physical objecrts) is now mainly things that I feel define me as a person, or at least the person I would like to be.

Tellingly, when I did my Mari Kondo, there was one category of things I couldn't get myself to "purge": My video games, almost all which are as unplayed today as they were then. Because I want to be a person who plays video games, okay, and I keep them around for the day when I surely will finish them all. Because here's the second thing: Video games are stories, and I collect stories.

And now they're piling up and I'm a horrible person )
type_wild: (Tea - Masako)
It's "YA fantasy gothic romance", apparently. I have no bloody clue where no less than two of the people writing blurbs found the 'gothic'. The romance does very much not play the narrative role you expect from something defined within the genre, and the fantasy is... somewhat the same, honestly. It is, however, written for teens, so... one out of four?

This isn't a problem with the novel as such, but with the way people are trying to sell it. You should definitely give it a try if the description below appeals to you, because I enjoyed it a lot. The "a lot" because of admittedly dumb spoilery reasons I'll detail under the cut. Overall, it is funny and occasionally touching and I liked all of the main cast.

The best summary I can give is probably this fine illustration, greeting you as you turn the page to the first chapter:



In more detail: Neglected British child goes to ~magical school~, keeps on being somewhat of an outsider there and spends his days with genius girl who is also somewhat of an outsider, and part of every summer holiday with the cheerful family of a boy who is very much a part of the establishment.

Or: Blaming the victim is always wrong but even slightly-shorter-than-average-for-his-age Elliot Schafer knows that he'd have an easier time if he wasn't compulsed to sass popular kids who taller and stronger than him. And at least he's not beat up in diplomacy classes in The Border Camp of The Otherlands, where he elected to stay because of the hot elf babe Serene-Heart-In-The-Chaos-Of-Battle. Unfortunately, Serene has attached herself to Luke Sunborn, who is tall and strong and popular and Elliot is most certainly not his friend, don't be disgusting.

Yes the core of the plot is inescapably Potter, but that's about as far as the similarities go. The standard fantasy plot of "ending a war and saving the world" is nominally there, but takes a definite backseat to Elliots social and romantic going-ons. Elliot, Serene and Luke are about as far removed from Harry, Hermione and Ron as you get. Elliot is bookish but otherwise unremarkable, Serene is a culturally out-of-sync warrior. Luke is... an inversion of Ron Weasly, mostly: the kind and polite and introverted and unconsciously popular kid who excells at everything concerning sports and martial arts, descending from one of the most revered families in the land. Also, there's this thing about Elliot worshipping the ground on which Serene walks so loudly and so out of character for him that no-one thinks he means it. There's his on-going, one-sided contempt of everything that is Luke Sunborn. The dynamics are so different that you'd be hard-pressed to get Hogwarts flashbacks except for the few reminders that Elliot's dad is a dick.

The illustration hints at the tone. In Other Lands follows Elliot through ages thirteen to seventeen, for his education in ~magical school~. Since Elliot is a precocious bookworm full of salt and vinegar, his narrative is a running line of snark about most everything - that is, when he's not lapsing exceedingly poetic about Serene's virtues. Four years are crammed into fourhundredandsome pages, and it's hardly a surprise that the fantasy keystones of "worldbuilding" and "political plot" take a definite backseat here. More than anything, this is a novel about growing up and becoming a better person, and I - at least - certainly think that shit is more entertaining if it comes through mermaid fanboying and casual elvish sexism ("A woman's experience of blood and pain is, naturally, what makes womenkind particularly suited for the battlefield. Whereas men are the softer sex, squeamish about blood in the main. I know it's the same for human men, Luke was extremely disinclined to discuss my first experience of a woman's menses.")

There's a plotline about a theatre club setting up the Romeo and Juliet of The Otherlands. For god's sake.

Yes, this is essentially a high school AU set in Narnia. It was not terribly surprising, when googled, that this started out as an "online novel". And wouldn't you know it: On the author's webpage, the commentaries she'd made to her work as she initially published it was links to good ole' eljay.

I have to talk about that, of course. Because I definitely suspect that part of the reason I enjoyed this book so much, was that there are elements of this book that definitely read like fanfic. Less so than The Captive Prince, for what it's worth.

SPOILERS BELOW THIS POINT.

i shipped it from like page two )
type_wild: (Default)
Lesson learned: Having no internet at home does only make me read marginally more real books, but has been hell on my data plan. I've been playing a pathetic amount of Fire Emblem: Heroes (I got BOTH Easter Alphonse and summer Innes, now all I need is Ephraim and Lucina and my life will be complete); the most remotely fannish thing I've done was watch the first half of Digimon Data Squad and writing a lot of snarky commentary.

I also revisited Nana the last couple of weeks. There's a lot I feel I could say about that, but let me just share what I put off my bedtime yesterday for. Let's just say that Hachi's life sure isn't boring.

I read books 1-8, and this all happens within the timespan of HOW LONG exactly )

Profile

type_wild: (Default)
Type Wild

July 2025

M T W T F S S
 123 456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

About me

I like stories.

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 06:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios